在台北市長選舉前哨站開始烽煙四起之際，時任北市市長的蔣萬安又因為他蔣家子弟的身分，興起一波網民之間的唇槍舌戰。說實在的，台灣走出蔣介石、蔣經國兩代強人統治數十年，在六年級以上的多數國民都是經過忠黨愛國的填鴨式洗腦教育長大，因此對於蔣家，特別是蔣經國的個人評價多半是正面，甚至能庇佑子孫，為選情加分。但是，如果有空翻閱這本《偽裝的改革者》，或許能替你摘下粉紅色的眼鏡，更客觀地思考蔣家、國民黨對於治理政府的能力與功過。
對於中國大國崛起、幾乎可以和美國比肩的當下，在共產中國喊出改革開放、打開市場經濟的鄧小平，無人敢否定他的歷史定位。然而，就如同退居台灣一方的蔣經國，這兩位是否真如普羅大眾認知般，是洞燭機先的改革者？本書是直接給了否定的大叉叉。就像日本漫畫《刃牙》曾經提出的共時性，觀察全球的政治局勢時，常常會在某個特定的時間點上，由具有相似人格特質的政治人物所主政。近的來說，英國前首相鮑里斯．強生和美國總統唐納．川普就非常雷同，書中提及的鄧小平和蔣經國又是一例。他們的前任都是擁有領袖魅力的政治強人毛澤東和蔣介石，而且都曾遠赴蘇聯學習共產主義思想，在史達林眼皮下過著共產黨員的日子。而蔣經國從蘇聯共產政體所學到的統治手法，例如以黨領政、特務機關等，之後也深遠地影響了台灣中華民國的政治制度。不論是軍隊的政戰體系以及法務部調查局，當初都是源自於國民黨主席的專制統治需要而成立。相較於中國走向馬克斯主義的極權政體，蔣家父子則是打造出牢不可破的威權政體，隔海相對。
在經濟政策上，他們本質上都是計劃經濟的信徒，認為私人企業的價值不能高於國營企業，自由市場經濟應該要受到國家監理、管制。王家衛電影《一代宗師》裡的台詞有一段：「人活一世，有的成了面子，有的成了裡子，都是時勢使然。」相當適合用來形容世事變化。其實不論是鄧小平還是蔣經國，他們所身處的，都是經歷千辛萬苦才能安穩活下去的亂世。一方面要伴君如伴虎地成為領袖最信賴的接班人，另一方面得面對各方派系、大老，將自身勢力深入黨政軍，以確保自己不被推翻。
有趣的是，這兩位領袖都是打從心裡反美，但又是從美國獲得最大的助益，最終成就了當下台灣的經濟成就以及中國的大國崛起。就結果論，在中國近代史上，兩位領導人是成功的。但誠如作者余杰所言，破除這些治國神話的迷思，其實更能讓讀者理解那些看似不合理的歷史片段究竟從何而來，還能察覺當初他們基於個人私心排除異己與改變體制，反而阻礙了國家朝向更正面的發展契機。
As the Taipei mayoral election begins to heat up, the current mayor of Taipei, Chiang Wan-an, has once again become the center of heated arguments among internet users because of his family background as a member of the Chiang family. To be honest, Taiwan spent several decades under the rule of two strongmen, Chiang Kai-shek and Chiang Ching-kuo. Most people who are now in their 60s or older grew up with an education that strongly emphasized loyalty to the ruling party and love of the country. As a result, many people still have a positive view of the Chiang family, especially Chiang Ching-kuo. In fact, his reputation can even help his descendants gain support in elections. However, if you have time to read this book, *The Fake Reformer*, it may help you take off those rose-colored glasses and think more objectively about the Chiang family and the KMT, including what they did well and what they did wrong in governing Taiwan.
Today, as China has grown into a major world power that can almost stand alongside the United States, few people would deny Deng Xiaoping's place in history for launching "reform and opening up" and opening China's economy to the market. However, just like Chiang Ching-kuo, who moved to Taiwan, were these two really the great reformers that most people believe they were? This book gives that idea a big red X. As the Japanese manga *Baki* once introduced the idea of "synchronicity," when we look at political situations around the world, we often find similar types of political leaders coming to power at certain points in history. A recent example would be former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and U.S. President Donald Trump, who are surprisingly similar in many ways. Deng Xiaoping and Chiang Ching-kuo, mentioned in this book, are another example. Their predecessors were both powerful leaders with strong personal charisma: Mao Zedong and Chiang Kai-shek. Both Deng Xiaoping and Chiang Ching-kuo also went to the Soviet Union to study communist ideas and spent time there as members of the Communist Party under Stalin's rule. Chiang Ching-kuo later brought some of the governing methods he learned from the Soviet communist system to Taiwan, such as the party's control over the government and the use of intelligence and secret police organizations. These methods had a deep influence on Taiwan's political system. Both the political warfare system in the military and the Investigation Bureau of Taiwan's Ministry of Justice were originally created to meet the needs of the KMT's authoritarian rule. While China developed into a Marxist totalitarian state, the Chiang family built a strong authoritarian state in Taiwan. The two sides were almost like two different versions of the same system across the Taiwan Strait.
In terms of economic policy, both leaders were essentially believers in a planned economy. They believed that private companies should not be more important than state-owned companies, and that the free market should be supervised and controlled by the government. There is a line from Wong Kar-wai's movie *The Grandmaster*: "In life, some people become the face, while others become the inside. It all depends on the times." I think this line is quite suitable for describing how history changes. In fact, both Deng Xiaoping and Chiang Ching-kuo lived through turbulent times when simply surviving safely was already extremely difficult. On one hand, they had to become the leaders' most trusted successors, while on the other hand, they had to deal with different political groups and powerful figures. They also had to build their own influence throughout the party, government, and military to make sure they would not be overthrown.
Interestingly, both leaders were strongly anti-American, yet they also received some of their greatest benefits from the United States. In the end, this helped create Taiwan's economic success and China's rise as a major world power. Judging by the results, both leaders were successful in modern Chinese history. But as the author, Yu Jie, points out, breaking down these political myths can actually help readers better understand where those seemingly unreasonable parts of history came from. It can also help us see that their personal interests, efforts to remove political opponents, and attempts to change the political system may have actually blocked opportunities for their countries to develop in a more positive direction.
